Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-01-06

WRIT - B No. 4591 of 2025 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - B No. 4591 of 2025 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - B No. 4591 of 2025 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - B No. - 4591 of 2025 Smt. Ram Kali .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mukesh Chandra Gupta, Shubham Prakash Gupta Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 54 HON'BLE DINESH PATHAK, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the respondents no.1 to 4. 2. The petitioner has invoked the extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India assailing the order dated 28.08.2025 passed by the Additional District Magistrate (Judicial)/Deputy Director of Consolidation, Agra (in brevity 'D.D.C.') in Revision No.0037 of 2025 affirming the order dated 11.11.2024 passed by the Settlement Officer of Consolidation (in brevity 'S.O.C.'), whereby delay condonation application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act has been allowed. 3. Perusal of order dated 11.11.2024 passed by the S.O.C. reveals that Appeal No.73 has been preferred by Dinesh Kumar (respondent no.5) against the order dated 05.11.2019 passed under Section 6-A of the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act (in brevity 'U.P.C.H. Act') at belated stage

WRIT - B No. 4591 of 2025 at Allahabad · Niyam