Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-01-29

WRIT - B No. 344 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - B No. 344 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - B No. 344 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - B No. - 344 of 2026 Akram Khan And 2 Others .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 15 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dharm Vir Jaiswal, Harsh Vikram Counsel for Respondent(s) : Arun Kumar Pandey, C.S.C. Court No. - 55 HON'BLE CHANDRA KUMAR RAI, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Awadhesh Kumar Patel, learned standing counsel for the state-respondents and Sri Arun Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the respondent-gaon sabha. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed for the following relief:- "Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus, commanding the respondent no.2, Board of Revenue, U.P. at Prayagraj to decide the Revision No.1163 of 2022 (District Amroha), Akram Khan and Others vs. Mohd. Farukh and Others, within the stipulated time." 3. Counsel for the petitioner states that revision filed by the petitioners arising out of the proceeding of suit under Section 229-B of the U.P. Z.A. & L.R. Act is pending before the respondent no.2/Board of Revenue, U.P. at Prayagraj. He further placed the copy of the order sheet of the pending proceeding, in order to demonstrate that the ca

WRIT - B No. 344 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam