Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-01-12

WRIT - B No. 3397 of 2025 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - B No. 3397 of 2025 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - B No. 3397 of 2025 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - B No. - 3397 of 2025 Vinod And 9 Others .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 8 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Puneet Kumar Verma Counsel for Respondent(s) : Ashutosh Kumar Singh, C.S.C. Court No. - 54 HON'BLE DINESH PATHAK, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the caveator/respondent no.7 and learned Standing Counsel for State-respondent nos. 1 and 2. 2. The petitioners are aggrieved by the order dated 16.12.2024 passed by Deputy Director of Consolidation, whereby the revision filed on behalf of contesting respondents was allowed and the said order was subsequently affirmed in the review application filed on behalf of the petitioners by order dated 30.05.2025. 3. Having considered the submissions advanced by learned counsel for the parties and upon perusal of the record, it is manifest that the Settlement Officer of Consolidation dismissed the appeal filed on behalf of present petitioners vide order dated 06.01.1998. Being aggrieved, the petitioners filed a restoration application. The Settlement Officer of Consolidation has allowed the restoration application, vide order date

WRIT - B No. 3397 of 2025 at Allahabad · Niyam