Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-01-29

WRIT - B No. 322 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - B No. 322 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - B No. 322 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - B No. - 322 of 2026 Ravi Shankar .....Petitioner(s) Versus State of U.P. and Another .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Prashant Sharma, Vibhanshu Dhar Dwivedi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 54 HON'BLE DINESH PATHAK, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Instant writ petition has been filed, inter alia, seeking the following relief :- "Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing and commanding the respondent No.2 to decide the proceedings of Case No.257 under Section 9-A (2) of the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953 including the amendment application within a fixed period forthwith" 3. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection, if a direction is issued to decide the aforesaid case, expeditiously. 4. In this conspectus as above, no useful purpose would be served to keep this matter pending, therefore, this Court deems it appropriate to finally dispose of the present writ petition, without making any observation on the merits of the case, as mentioned in the writ petition, with a direction to the Consolidation Officer (Respondent no.2) to decide the aforesaid case strict

WRIT - B No. 322 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam