Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-01-28

WRIT - B No. 295 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - B No. 295 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - B No. 295 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - B No. - 295 of 2026 Gufran Ali .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 46 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Suresh Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 54 HON'BLE DINESH PATHAK, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Instant writ petition has been filed, inter alia, seeking the following relief :- "Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the Deputy Director of Consolidation, Chandauli (respondent no.2) to decide the Case No.0414/2025 (Computer Case No.202554141800000414), Gufran Ali & others Vs. Ram Vriksha & others, Under Section 48 (1) of U.P.C.H. Act, 1953, pending in his court expeditiously within the stipulated period as prescribed by this Hon'ble Court." 3. It is submitted that the aforesaid case is pending consideration since the date of its filing, despite the fact that opposite parties have already appeared in the revision and the same is ripen for final adjudication. It is further submitted that in grab of the pendency of the revision, respondents wants to dispossess the present petitioner. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection, if a direction is

WRIT - B No. 295 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam