Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-01-09

WRIT - B No. 29 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - B No. 29 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - B No. 29 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - B No. - 29 of 2026 Gurbakhsh Singh .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Akhilesh Kumar Pandey, Nasir Hussain, Sr. Advocate Counsel for Respondent(s) : Arun Kumar Pandey, C.S.C. Court No. - 55 HON'BLE CHANDRA KUMAR RAI, J. 1. Heard Sri Vinay Kumar Khare, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Sri Nasir Hussain, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri M.N. Mishra, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State-respondents and Sri Arun Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the respondent- Gram-Sabha. 2. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the instant writ petition is heard finally without inviting counter affidavit. 3. Brief facts of the case are that suit under Section 229-B of the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 (hereinafter referred to as the U.P.Z.A. & L.R. Act) was filed by petitioner before trial Court/ Sub- Divisional Officer. Trial Court without framing the issues in the suit has dismissed the plaintiff's suit vide judgment & decree dated 29.05.1997. The appeal filed by the petitioner was dismissed by the first appellate Court vide j

WRIT - B No. 29 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam