Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-01-28

WRIT - B No. 287 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - B No. 287 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - B No. 287 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - B No. - 287 of 2026 Jiya Lal .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Kailash Nath Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 54 HON'BLE DINESH PATHAK, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Instant writ petition has been filed, inter alia, for the following relief :- "Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding and directing the of Respondent No.2/Deputy Director Consolidation, District Jaunpur to decide the stay application in Revision No. 1380 [Jiya Lal and Others Vs. Guru Prasad and Others] under Section 48(1) of the U.P.C.H. Act and till the disposal of the stay application, direct the Respondent No. 3/Consolidation Officer, Sadar (Rule 109), District Jaunpur not to proceed and decide the Computerized Case No.202554143658040231 [Sochan and Others Vs. State] under Rule 109(A) of the U.P.C.H. Rules." 3. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection, if a direction is issued to decide the aforesaid case, expeditiously. 4. In this conspectus as above, no useful purpose would be served to keep this matter pending, therefore, this Court dee

WRIT - B No. 287 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam