Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-01-27

WRIT - B No. 2681 of 2025 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - B No. 2681 of 2025 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - B No. 2681 of 2025 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - B No. - 2681 of 2025 Raghunandan And Another .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 8 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ali Bin Saif, Shadab Husain Counsel for Respondent(s) : Akash Rawat, C.S.C., Pankaj Kumar Shukla Court No. - 54 HON'BLE DINESH PATHAK, J. 1. Instant writ petition has been filed assailing the order dated 20.06.2025 passed by the Settlement Officer of Consolidation in Appeal under Section 11(1) of UPCH Act. 2. Learned counsel for the contesting-respondents has raised a preliminary objection with respect to the maintainability of the instant writ petition on the ground of availability of alternative remedy. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners has not refuted the contention as raised by learned counsel for the respondent qua availability of the remedy against the order passed by the Settlement Officer of Consolidation, as mentioned above. 4. As such, the instant writ petition is dismissed as not maintainable on the ground of availability of the alternative remedy to approach before the appropriate forum, as prescribed under law. (Dinesh Pathak,J.) January 27, 2026 vinay Digitally signed by :- VI

WRIT - B No. 2681 of 2025 at Allahabad · Niyam