Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-01-30

WRIT - B No. 221 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - B No. 221 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - B No. 221 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - B No. - 221 of 2026 Jagdish Prasad And 2 Others .....Petitioner(s) Versus Deputy Director Of Consolidation And 9 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shivam Pandey, Suryaprakash Sharma, Vipin Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 54 HON'BLE DINESH PATHAK, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Standing Counsel representing State-respondents and perused the record on board. 2. This writ petition has been filed, inter alia, for the following relief: "a. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding and directing the respondent no. 1 decide the restoration application no. 903/2023 in Revision No. 968/699/513/400 of 2016 (Jagdish Prasad & others Vs. Jagdamba Prasad & others) pending before him, within the stipulated period as may be fixed by this Hon'ble Court." 3. It has been submitted that the matter is pending consideration for a substantial period of time; however, no efforts are being made to get the same decided expeditiously. 4. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection, in case, a direction is issued for expeditious disposal of the aforementioned matte

WRIT - B No. 221 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam