Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-01-16

WRIT - B No. 114 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - B No. 114 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - B No. 114 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - B No. - 114 of 2026 Rajkali .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Saurabh Singh, Utsav Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 54 HON'BLE DINESH PATHAK, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Instant writ petition has been filed beseeching expeditious disposal of Case No.313 and 314 (State vs. Lalmani And Others) under Section 9A (2) of U.P.C.H. Act, which is pending consideration before the Consolidation Officer (Respondent no.3), within the stipulated period. 3. It is submitted that the aforesaid matter is pending since 2018 despite the fact that opposite party in the original application has appeared and the case is ready for final adjudication. 4. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection, if a direction is issued to decide the aforesaid case, expeditiously. 5. In this conspectus as above, no useful purpose would be served to keep this matter pending, therefore, this Court deems it appropriate to finally dispose of the present writ petition, without making any observation on the merits of the case, as mentioned in the writ petition, with a direction t

WRIT - B No. 114 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam