Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-01-19

WRIT - A No. 9887 of 2024 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - A No. 9887 of 2024 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - A No. 9887 of 2024 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 9887 of 2024 Pratap Singh .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of Up And 6 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Amit Goel Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 33 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard Sri Amit Goel, learned counsel for the writ petitioner and Sri S.K. Pal, learned Addl. Chief Standing Counsel for the State. 2. The case of the writ petitioner is that the writ petitioner was appointed in the year 1984 as Constable and he was promoted as Head Constable in the year 2003 and further promoted on the post of Sub-Inspector. It is also the case of the writ petitioner that he superannuated on 30.09.2022, however, according to the writ petitioner post retirement now recovery has been sought to be made by virtue of the order dated 07.03.2024 passed by Ahran Vitran Adhikari, Police Department, Gautam Buddh Nagar to the tune of an amount of Rs. 6,60,887/-. 3. Questioning the said order, the present writ petition has been preferred. 4. Learned counsel for the writ petitioner has submitted that before passing the said order, the writ petitioner was not put to notice and the entire action is unilateral behind th

WRIT - A No. 9887 of 2024 at Allahabad · Niyam