Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-01-19

WRIT - A No. 95 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - A No. 95 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - A No. 95 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 95 of 2026 Adi Shakti Devi .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shiv Sagar Singh, Suraj Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 33 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard Sri Shiv Sagar Singh, learned counsel for the writ petitioner and Sri Gaurav Singh, learned Standing Counsel for the State. 2. The grievance of the writ petitioner is that she had applied for the recruitment on the post of Anganbadi Karyakatri, however, it so happened that though she claims to have been selected, but she was not accorded joining. Pursuant to the appointment order dated 05.07.2025, the writ petitioner preferred Writ-A No.7562 of 2025, which came to be disposed of requiring the writ petitioner to prefer representation, which was directed to be decided within a period of six weeks. Thereafter the impugned order has been passed on 10.12.2025 cancelling the candidature of the writ petitioner. According to the writ petitioner, the writ petitioner has already preferred an appeal, but now it is the apprehension of the writ petitioner that the said post to be filled up by somebody el

WRIT - A No. 95 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam