Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-01-28

WRIT - A No. 938 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - A No. 938 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - A No. 938 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 938 of 2026 Shivam Yadav .....Petitioner(s) Versus Union Of India And Another .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ankit Kumar Yadav, Deepak Kumar Kulshrestha, Pusp Raj Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I., Pankaj Kumar Court No. - 33 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard Sri Deepak Kumar Kulshrestha, learned counsel for the writ petitioner and Sri Pankaj Kumar, learned counsel for the respondents. 2. The case of the writ petitioner is that in pursuance of an Advertisement published on 05.09.2024 for selection on the post of Constable (GD) in CAPFs, the writ petitioner participated. However, he was declared unfit in medical examination, as hemoglobin was found to be 8.7 gm. Thereafter, review medical was done, in which it was found 11.5 gm. However, according to the writ petitioner, he got blood test done from Tej Bahadur Sapru Hospital, Prayagraj, where it was found to be 12.04 gm. 3. Prayer in the present writ petition is for a direction to the respondents to conduct a medical test for hemoglobin. 4. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that in the medical examination and review medical examination, hemoglob

WRIT - A No. 938 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam