Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-01-27

WRIT - A No. 908 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - A No. 908 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - A No. 908 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 908 of 2026 Sanjay Kumar .....Petitioner(s) Versus The State Of U.P. And Another .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vinay Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 33 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard Sri Vinay Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri P.K. Srivastava, learned Addl. Chief Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. 2. Petitioner, who is working as volunteer of U.P. Prantiya Rakshak Dal (PRD), is claiming some wages as minimum of the wages as being paid to Home Guards and Grah Rakshak in the State of Uttar Pradesh. 3. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that identical issue had earlier been raised in Writ-A No.2829 of 2022 (Rajveer Singh & 62 ors vs. State of UP & ors) along with connected matters in which final judgment was delivered on 03.08.2023 issuing directions for recomputing the remuneration and allowances to the Jawans of U.P. Prantiya Rakshak Dal at par with the Grah Rakshak and Homeguards of the State under the orders of the Supreme Court in Grah Rakshak, Home Guards Welfare Association vs. State of H.P. & ors; 2015 (6) SCC 247. The operative portion of

WRIT - A No. 908 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam