Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-01-27

WRIT - A No. 890 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - A No. 890 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - A No. 890 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 890 of 2026 Mohd Shaukeen .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mohammad Aon Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 33 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard Sri Mohammad Aon, learned counsel for the writ petitioner and Sri Rahul Malviya, learned Standing Counsel for the State. 2. A preliminary objection has been raised regarding maintainability of the writ petition on the ground that the writ petitioner was engaged by Respondent no.4, Private Service Provider, and thus any remuneration is to be paid by the outsourcing agency, thus the writ petition would not lie. 3. To such a submission, learned counsel for the writ petitioner has no objection. 4. The writ petition stands disposed of leaving it open for the writ petitioner to take legal recourse as permissible under law. January 27, 2026 N.S.Rathour (Vikas Budhwar,J.) Digitally signed by :- NIPENDRA SINGH RATHOUR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

WRIT - A No. 890 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam