WRIT - A No. 883 of 2026 at Allahabad

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 883 of 2026 Chatarpal Singh .....Petitioner(s) Versus The State Of U.P. And Another .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Irfan Ahmad Malik Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 33 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard Sri Irfan Ahmad Malik, learned counsel for the writ petitioner and Sri Rahul Malviya, learned Standing Counsel for the State. 2. Sri Rahul Malviya, learned Standing Counsel has made a statement that he is well equipped with the instructions and is in a position to argue the case. He does not propose to file any counter affidavit and he further submits that the writ petition be decided on the basis of the documents available on record. 3. With the consent of the parties, the writ petition is being decided at the fresh stage. 4. The case of the writ petitioner is that he retired from the post of Sub- Inspector on 28.02.2023. According to the writ petitioner by way of the orders impugned dated 27.08.2022 and 18.04.2023, passed by the Respondent No.2, SSP, Meerut, re-fixation has been done and recovery has been directed. Learned counsel for the writ petitioner submits that the same is in violation of pri