Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-01-27

WRIT - A No. 873 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - A No. 873 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - A No. 873 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 873 of 2026 Ashok Kumar Singh .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Bibhuti Narayan Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 33 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard Sri B.N. Singh, learned counsel for the writ petitioner and Sri Manish Kumar, learned Standing Counsel for the State. 2. The grievance of the writ petitioner is that though the writ petitioner retired on 30.03.2021, as Head Operator, Police Radio. However, there are certain medical bills to the tune of Rs.8,16,569/-, which are not been paid. 3. Learned Standing Counsel on the other hand submits that the claim of the writ petitioner needs examination at the first instance by Respondent no.2. 4. Considering the submissions so made across the Bar, the writ petition stands disposed of directing the writ petitioner to prefer a comprehensive representation along with self attested copy of the writ petition and the certified copy of the order before Respondent no.2, who on the said motion shall proceed to consider the claim of the writ petitioner strictly in accordance with law within a period of two mon

WRIT - A No. 873 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam