Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-01-27

WRIT - A No. 872 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - A No. 872 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - A No. 872 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 872 of 2026 Mohd. Irshad .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vinay Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 33 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard Sri Vinay Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for the writ petitioner and Sri Manish Kumar, learned Standing Counsel for the State. 2. Sri Manish Kumar, learned Standing Counsel has made a statement that he is well equipped with the instructions and is in a position to argue the case. He does not propose to file any counter affidavit and he further submits that the writ petition be decided on the basis of the documents available on record. 3. With the consent of the parties, the writ petition is being decided at the fresh stage. 4. The case of the writ petitioner is that he was initially appointed on the post of Constable on 11.12.2006 and he was promoted as Head Constable in the year 2020 and he was accorded joining at District Kushinagar. According to the writ petitioner an order came to be passed by the second respondent transferring the writ petitioner from Mahoba to GRP Jhansi on 19.06.2020 and the writ pe

WRIT - A No. 872 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam