Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-01-30

WRIT - A No. 835 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - A No. 835 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - A No. 835 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 835 of 2026 Pramod Kumar Mishra .....Petitioner(s) Versus State of U.P. and 4 others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Praful Dev Shukla, Rishi Kant Rai, Shashank Shekhar Rai, Shubham Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 33 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard Sri Rishi Kant Rai, learned counsel for the writ petitioner and Sri Gaurav Singh, learned Standing Counsel for the State. 2. Sri Gaurav Singh, learned Standing Counsel has made a statement that he is well equipped with the instructions and is in a position to argue the matter. He does not propose to file any counter affidavit and he further submits that the writ petition be decided on the basis of the documents available on record. 3. With the consent of the parties, the writ petition is being decided at the fresh stage. 4. The case of the writ petitioner is that he was appointed as Addl. District Cooperative Officer on 08.01.2015 and he was accorded posing in District Pratapgarh, who worked their till 31.07.2018 and thereafter transferred to Gonda and he was in Gonda till November 2022 and since 2022, the petitioner is posted as Addl. District Cooperat

WRIT - A No. 835 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam