Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-01-22

WRIT - A No. 770 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - A No. 770 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - A No. 770 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 770 of 2026 Arti .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Akshara Rai, Sujeet Kumar Rai Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 33 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard Sri Sujeet Kumar Rai, learned counsel for the writ petitioner and Sri Gaurav Singh, learned Standing Counsel for the State. 2. Sri Gaurav Singh, learned Standing Counsel has made a statement at bar that he is possessed with the instructions and he is in a position to argue the matter and he does not propose to file any affidavit, the writ petition be decided on the basis of the documents available on record. With the consent of the parties, the writ petition is being decided at the fresh stage. 3. The case of the writ petitioner is that she is working as Staff Nurse in Women Hospital she had preferred an application for maternity leave from 22.02.2024 and again on 01.11.2025 to 29.04.2026, however, the maternity leave has not been accorded to the writ petitioner for the period 01.11.2025 to 29.04.2026. Learned counsel for the writ petitioner seeks to rely upon the judgment of this Court in Court in Wri

WRIT - A No. 770 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam