Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-01-09

WRIT - A No. 73 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - A No. 73 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - A No. 73 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 73 of 2026 Dinesh Kumar .....Petitioner(s) Versus The Union Of India And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Divya Jyoti, Mohammad Fahad Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I. Court No. - 33 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard Sri Devesh Mishra (AoR A/D 0378 of 2018) holding brief of Ms. Divya Jyoti, learned counsel for the writ petitioner and Sri S.K. Pal, DSGI for the State. 2. A preliminary objection has been raised by the learned counsel of the respondent that this Court may not have territorial jurisdiction particularly when the dismissal order came to be passed in Jammu Kashmir and the appellate and the revisional order have been passed in Delhi. He seeks to rely upon the Full Bench Decision in Rajendra Kumar Mishra Vs. Union of India (2005) 1 UPLBEC 108. Learned counsel for the writ petitioner in order to meet the said objection has sought to argue that the writ petitioner is a resident of District Etawah and presently he is residing in all the correspondences have been owned. He seeks to rely upon the Apex Court judgment in Kusum Ingots & Alloys Ltd. Vs. Union of India and another: (2004) 6 SCC 254, Nawal

WRIT - A No. 73 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam