Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-01-21

WRIT - A No. 673 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - A No. 673 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - A No. 673 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 673 of 2026 Smt. Santosh Srivastava .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Upendra Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 33 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard Sri Upendra Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the writ petitioner and Sri Rahul Malviya, learned Standing Counsel for the State. 2. The case of the writ petitioner is that she is the widow of Late Narendra Kumar Srivastava who was working Forest Authority against him an order came to be passed dispensing with the services in the year 2011 which was subject matter of challenge in Writ-A No. 27380 of 2011, however, the said writ petition was dismissed with liberty to approach the U.P. Public Service Tribunal. Learned counsel for the writ petitioner submits that the husband of the writ petitioner has not preferred any proceedings before the tribunal. The husband of the writ petitioner has also expired. The writ petitioner since payment of salary for the period when her husband had worked and also other benefits. 3. Learned Standing Counsel submits that there happens to be an order dated 05.02.20

WRIT - A No. 673 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam