Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-01-21

WRIT - A No. 638 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - A No. 638 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - A No. 638 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 638 of 2026 Shikhar Gaur .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Akshay Kumar Shukla, Ravindra Pal Singh Kashyap Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 33 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard Sri R.P.S. Kashyap learned counsel for the writ petitioner and Sri Gaurav Singh, learned Standing Counsel for the State. 2. Sri Gaurav Singh has made a statement at bar that he is well equipped with the instructions and he does not propose to file any affidavit and the writ petition be decided on the basis of the documents available on record. With the consent of the parties, the writ petition is being decided at the fresh stage. 3. The writ petitioner claims to be a Panchayat Secretary, however, owing to the allegation of misappropriation and irregularity committed by the writ petitioner a fact finding inquiry stood conducted and thereafter on 18.09.2025, a notice has been issued to the writ petitioner for recovery by the District Panchayat Raj Officer. Learned counsel for the writ petitioner submits that the writ petitioner shall prefer an appeal before the concerned Distric

WRIT - A No. 638 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam