WRIT - A No. 6218 of 2004 at Lucknow

AFR Reserved on 08.12.2025 Delivered on 20.01.2026 HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT – A No. - 6218 of 2004 Ramesh Chandra Singh …..Petitioners(s) Versus The State of U.P. Through …..Respondents(s) The Secy Home and 3 Ors. Counsel for Petitioners(s) : H.G.S. Parihar, Ajai Krishna Yadav, Anil Kumar Maurya, Mansha Shukla, Meenakshi Singh, Meenakshi Singh Parihar, Vivek Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 34 HON’BLE INDRAJEET SHUKLA, J. For the convenience of exposition, this judgment is divided into the following parts:- TABLE OF CONTENTS SL.No. Heading Page Nos. A. FACTUAL MATRIX 02-09 B. AVAILABILITY OF ALTERNATIVE REMEDY 09-09 C. SUBMISSION ON BEHALF OF PETITIONER 09-11 D. SUBMISSION ON BEHALF OF STATE 11-13 RESPONDENTS E. RELEVANT RULES 14-15 F. ANALYSIS AND REASONING 15-33 G. CONCLUSION 33-34 2 Writ-A No.-6218 of 2024 1. Heard Sri Ajai Krishna Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Dev Prakash Mishra, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel representing the State respondents. 2. By means of present writ proceedings, the petitioner has set up challenge to the impugned order dated 14.04.2000 passed by 4th respondent removing the petitio