WRIT - A No. 542 of 2026 at Allahabad

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 542 of 2026 Bhola Nath .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Bhole Ram Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 33 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard Sri B. Ram, learned counsel for the writ petitioner and Sri Manish Kumar, learned Standing Counsel for the State. 2. Sri Manish Kumar, learned Standing Counsel has made a statement that he is well equipped with the instructions and is in a position to argue the case. He does not propose to file any counter affidavit and he further submits that the writ petition be decided on the basis of the documents available on record. 3. With the consent of the parties, the writ petition is being decided at the fresh stage. 4. The case of the writ petitioner is that he was initially appointed on the post of Constable (PAC) on 01.09.1988, however, the writ petitioner has been transferred to Jhansi. He seeks transfer to Prayagraj or any adjoining districts. Since his claim has not been considered, the writ petitioner preferred Writ-A No.14384 of 2025, which came to be disposed of directing the respondents to decide the representat