Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-01-20

WRIT - A No. 536 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - A No. 536 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - A No. 536 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 536 of 2026 Bhogilal .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anil Kumar Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 33 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard Sri Anil Kumar Shukla, learned counsel for the writ petitioner and Sri Gaurav Singh, learned Standing Counsel for the State. 2. The grievance of the writ petitioner is that he is working since 1993 as a Class-IV employee in the Forest Department and he seeks minimum of pay- scale in light of the judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court in Sabha Shankar Dubey vs. Divisional Forest Officer, Civil Appeal No. 10956 of 2018 decided on 14.11.2018. 3. Learned Standing Counsel on the other hand submits that the claim of the writ petitioner is to be decided at the first instance by Respondent no.3. 4. Considering the submissions so made across the Bar, the writ petition stands disposed of directing the writ petitioner to prefer a comprehensive representation along with self attested copy of the writ petition and the certified copy of the order before Respondent no.3, who on the said motion shall proceed to consider the claim

WRIT - A No. 536 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam