Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-01-20

WRIT - A No. 526 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - A No. 526 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - A No. 526 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 526 of 2026 Ramashray Yadav .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rajvendra Singh, Rakesh Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 33 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard Sri Rakesh Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for the writ petitioner and Sri Manish Kumar, learned Standing Counsel for the State. 2. A preliminary objection has been raised by learned Standing Counsel that the present writ petition may not be maintainable for the simple reason that the writ petitioner herein is a complainant who seeks the relief to conclude the departmental proceedings against the respondent no. 4. 3. In the opinion of the Court, the writ petitioner has no locus standi to maintain the writ petition, accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. 4. Needless to point out that it is always open for the State respondents to take call over the matter. (Vikas Budhwar,J.) January 20, 2026 Rajesh Digitally signed by :- RAJESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

WRIT - A No. 526 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam