Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-01-20

WRIT - A No. 494 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - A No. 494 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - A No. 494 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 494 of 2026 Sanjay Kumar Singh .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 7 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ajay Kumar Pal, Vikrant Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 33 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Sri Vikrant Pratap Singh, learned counsel for the writ petitioner submits that though the writ petitioner is working as Village Development Officer, however, orders have been passed on 17.11.2025 and 28.11.2025 by District Magistrate, Kushinagar and District Development Officer, Kushinagar seeking to recover surcharge from the writ petitioner. Learned counsel for the writ petitioner next submitted that the writ petitioner shall be filing an appeal before the District Magistrate, however, protection be accorded. 2. Considering the submissions so made across the Bar, the writ petition stands disposed of directing the writ petitioner to prefer an appeal before the concerned competent authority, District Magistrate, Kushinagar by 30.01.2026. On the said motion, the District Magistrate shall proceed to decide the appeal within a period of two months. 3. Till filing of the appeal, i.e. by 30.0

WRIT - A No. 494 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam