Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-01-19

WRIT - A No. 438 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - A No. 438 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - A No. 438 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 438 of 2026 Smt.Prema Devi .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Ofuttar Pradesh And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Kumar Amit Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 33 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard Sri Kumar Amit, learned counsel for the writ petitioner and Sri Anoop Kumar, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State. 2. The grievance of the writ petitioner is that he superannuated on 31.07.2019 as Health Visitor, however, gratuity has not been paid. 3. Learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel submits that the claim of the writ petitioner shall be decided by third respondent, Additional Director, Treasury and Pension, Prayagraj Division, Prayagraj. 4. Considering the submission so made across the bar, the writ petition stands disposed of directing the writ petitioner to submit a comprehensive representation along with self attested copy of the writ petition and certified copy of the order before the third respondent, Additional Director, Treasury and Pension, Prayagraj Division, Prayagraj by 30.01.2026. Thereafter, the third respondent shall decide the claim of the writ petitioner wit

WRIT - A No. 438 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam