Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-01-16

WRIT - A No. 383 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - A No. 383 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - A No. 383 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 383 of 2026 Virendra Singh .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Amit Goel, Arun Kumar Goyal Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 33 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard Sri Amit Goel, learned counsel for the writ petitioner and Sri S.K. Pal, learned Standing Counsel for the State. 2. Sri S.K. Pal, learned Standing Counsel has made a statement at Bar that he is well equipped with the instructions and is in a position to argue the case. He does not propose to file any counter affidavit and the writ petition be decided on the basis of the documents available on record. 3. With the consent of the parties, the writ petition is being decided at the fresh stage. 4. The case of the writ petitioner is that he was appointed on the post of Constable on 01.03.1986, promoted as Head Constable in the year 2017 and Sub-Inspector in the year 2022 and superannuated on 30.11.2025. According to the writ petitioner, order impugned dated 18.10.2025 came to be passed by Assistant Commissioner of Police (Accounts), Gautam Budh Nagar recovering an amount of Rs.4,24,436/-. 5. Question

WRIT - A No. 383 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam