Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-01-16

WRIT - A No. 363 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - A No. 363 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - A No. 363 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 363 of 2026 Kunji Lal .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ashok Kumar Pandey, Harindra Prasad Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 33 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard Sri Harindra Prasad, learned counsel for the writ petitioner and Sri Jitendra Prasad, learned Standing Counsel for the State. 2. The case of the writ petitioner is that while the writ petitioner was posted as Lekhpal, he was placed under suspension by District Magistrate, Azamgarh on 28.04.2025 while directing for holding of inquiry. 3. Questioning the said order, the present writ petition has been preferred. 4. Learned counsel for the writ petitioner has sought to argue that the writ petitioner is a Lakhpal only and he had at no point of time issued any certificate and the alleged inquiry ex parte which became the basis for suspension. He further submits that only minor punishment can be imposed. 5. Learned Standing Counsel submits that the suspension order has been passed wayback on 28.04.2025 and charge sheet has been issued on 17.06.2025 to which the writ petitioner has rendered his repl

WRIT - A No. 363 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam