WRIT - A No. 342 of 2026 at Allahabad

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 342 of 2026 Smt Shaily .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sushil Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 33 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard Sri Sushil Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Pramod Kumar Srivastava, learned Addl. Chief Standing Counsel, who appears for State-respondents. 2. The grievance of the writ petitioner is that the writ petitioner happens to be working as Senior Assistant, however, by virtue of the order dated 18.11.2025, certain works have been taken away. 3. Learned Addl. Chief Standing Counsel submits that there is no legal injuries sustained by the writ petitioner, particularly, when there has been no change in the pay-scale etc. 4. Bearing in mind the aforesaid factual position, it is always open for the writ petitioner to approach the competent authority, if he chooses. 5. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition is disposed off. January 27, 2026 Ashu (Vikas Budhwar,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH KUMAR PRAJAPATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad