Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-01-27

WRIT - A No. 334 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - A No. 334 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - A No. 334 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 334 of 2026 Arjun Singh And 34 Others .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rajesh Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 33 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard Sri Rajesh Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners as well as Sri Pramod Kumar Srivastava, learned Addl. Chief Standing Counsel for the State. 2. Shri Rajesh Singh, learned counsel for the writ petitioner seeks withdrawal of the writ petition on behalf of the writ petitioner nos. 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 30 and 31 on the ground with a liberty to file writ petition before the Court having territorial jurisdiction over the matter. Thus, liberty is accorded to writ petitioner nos. 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 30 and 31 to approach the Court having territorial jurisdiction over the matter. 3. By means of this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution, petitioners who were working in the police department in State Police, want an additional increment of pay on completion of 19 years of service in the light of judgment of this Court in the case of Ghanshyam Tiwari vs. State of U.P. & othe

WRIT - A No. 334 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam