Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-01-22

WRIT - A No. 247 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - A No. 247 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - A No. 247 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 247 of 2026 Ramesh Chandra Yadav .....Petitioner(s) Versus The State Of Up And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Archana Singh, Bramh Narayan Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 33 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard Sri Bramh Narayan Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Jitendra Prasad, learned Standing Counsel, who appears for State- respondents. 2. Prayer in the present petition is for a direction to the respondents to accord notional increment from 01.07.2020 till 30.06.2021. Reliance has been placed upon the judgement of the Hon'ble Apex Court in Civil Appeal No. 2471 of 2023 (The Director (Admin. and HR) KPTCL & Ors.) v. C.P. Mundinani & Ors), decided on 11.04.2023. 4. Learned Standing Counsel submits that the claim of the writ petitioner needs adjudication at the first instance by the third respondent, the Finance Controller, Police Headquarters, Lucknow. 5. To such a submission, learned counsel for the petitioner has no objection and he gracefully accepts the same. 6. Considering the submissions of the rival parties as well as stand taken by them, the writ petition is bei

WRIT - A No. 247 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam