Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-01-20

WRIT - A No. 200 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - A No. 200 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - A No. 200 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 200 of 2026 Rajesh Kumar .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ashok Kumar Upadhyay, Rahul Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 33 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard Sri Rahul Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Rahul Malviya, learned Standing Counsel, who appears for State- respondents. 2. Instructions have been supplied by Sri Rahul Malviya, learned Standing Counsel, submits that he is well equipped with the instructions and the instructions are self-sufficient for disposal of the writ petition and he does not propose to file any further affidavit and the petition be decided on the basis of the documents available on record, thus with the consent of the parties, writ petition is being decided at the fresh stage. 3. The case of the writ petitioner is that he was initially appointed in the Marketing Department of Food and Civil Supplies and thereafter he was promoted to the post of Area Marketing Officer. Since July, 2022, the petitioner had been posted as Area Marketing Officer, District Mirzapur and had been entrusted with sens

WRIT - A No. 200 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam