Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-01-06

WRIT - A No. 19449 of 2025 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - A No. 19449 of 2025 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - A No. 19449 of 2025 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 19449 of 2025 Jaykaran .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Chandra Dutt Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 33 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard Sri Chandra Dutt, learned counsel for the writ petitioner and Sri R.S. Umrao, learned Standing Counsel for the State. 2. The grievance of the writ petitioner is that though the writ petitioner was appointed as Lekhpal on 18.03.1975 and he was superannuated on 31.08.2009, however, he is not being paid the second promotional pay-scale after completion of 24 years of service and Third ACP after completion of 26 years of service. 3. Learned Standing Counsel on the other hand submits that the claim of the writ petitioner needs adjudication at the first instance by second Respondent. 4. Having heard the counsel for the parties, the writ petition stands disposed of directing the writ petitioner to prefer a comprehensive representation along with self attested copy of the writ petition and the certified copy of the order before Respondent no.2, who on the said motion shall proceed to consider the claim of the writ petiti

WRIT - A No. 19449 of 2025 at Allahabad · Niyam