WRIT - A No. 19309 of 2025 at Allahabad

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 19309 of 2025 Mool Chand .....Petitioner(s) Versus Union Of India And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Satish Mohan Tiwari, Vikram Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I., Kuldeep Kumar Court No. - 33 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard Sri Satish Mohan Tiwari, learned counsel for the writ petitioner and Sri S.P. Singh, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Kuldeep Chauhan, learned counsel for the respondents. 2. A preliminary objection has been raised by learned counsel for the respondents on the ground that the present writ petition may not maintainable for the simple reason that the writ petitioner has an alternate and efficacious remedy for approaching the Central Administrative Tribunal while filing an Original Application under Section 19(V) of Administrative Tribunal Act, 1985. He seeks to rely upon the decision of the Hon’ble Apex Court in L. Chandra Kumar Vs. Union of India : AIR 1997 Supreme Court 1125. 3. Sri Satish Mohan Tiwari, learned counsel for the writ petitioner could not dispute the said legal position, however, according to him a direction be issued to the Tribunal to decide the orig