Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-01-19

WRIT - A No. 19300 of 2025 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - A No. 19300 of 2025 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - A No. 19300 of 2025 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 19300 of 2025 Vinay Kumar Srivastava .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Tejas Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 33 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard Sri Tejas Singh, learned counsel for the writ petitioner and Sri Gaurav Singh, learned Standing Counsel for the State. 2. The case of the writ petitioner is that he was appointed as Class-IV employee on 27.07.1988 and thereafter on the post of Dresser since 22.06.1989. He was accorded promotion on 22.06.2003 and thereafter he was accorded third ACP along with other benefits. The service of the writ petitioner came to be dispensed with, so the writ petitioner preferred Writ-A No.11586 of 1995, Sri Vinay Kumar Srivastava vs. The Director, Directorate of Employees States and others, in which on 10.09.2013, the following orders were passed:- "The petitioner has preferred this writ petition aggrieved by the order of his termination order dated 18.4.1995 passed by the sole respondent No.1/Director Employees State Insurance Scheme, Labour Medical Services, U.P., Kanpur. Heard Sri Ranjeet Saxena, learned coun

WRIT - A No. 19300 of 2025 at Allahabad · Niyam