WRIT - A No. 18965 of 2022 at Allahabad

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 18965 of 2022 Shyam Narain Pathak .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Arvind Kumar Verma, Mahesh Sharma Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 33 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard Sri Mahesh Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri R.S. Umrao, learned Standing Counsel, who appears for State-respondents. 2. Since counter and rejoinder affidavits have been exchanged and the petition be decided on the basis of the documents available on record, thus with the consent of the parties, writ petition is being decided at the fresh stage. 3. The case of the writ petitioner is that the writ petitioner was appointed as Seasional Collection Amin on 22.04.1983. He staked his claim for regularisation as Collection Amin in terms of U.P. Collection Amin Service Rules, 1974, according to the writ petitioner, one Ramanand Yadav who was junior to the writ petitioner was granted regularisation on 17.01.1992, however, the services of the writ petitioner stood regularized on 04.10.2004 though the writ petitioner was entitled from 17.01.1992. The services of the other jun