Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-01-19

WRIT - A No. 18877 of 2025 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - A No. 18877 of 2025 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - A No. 18877 of 2025 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 18877 of 2025 Smt. Seema Tiwari .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Amit Saxena, Pratima Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 33 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard Sri Amit Saxena, learned counsel for the writ petitioner and Sri Pramod Kumar Srivastava, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State. 2. Sri Pramod Kumar Srivastava, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel has made a statement at bar that he is well equipped with the instructions and he is in a position to argue the matter and he does not propose to file any affidavit the writ petition be decided on the basis of the documents available on record. With the consent of the parties, the writ petition is being decided at this stage. 3. The case of the writ petitioner is that he was appointed on the post of Clerk in the Sale Tax Department on 04.08.1990 and he was promoted as Sale Tax Officer on 24.06.2020 and while the writ petitioner was working as the Sale Tax Officer on 05.12.2023 one M/s Vijay Traders filed an application for grant of GST. On 06.12.2023, the Assistant Commiss

WRIT - A No. 18877 of 2025 at Allahabad · Niyam