WRIT - A No. 17017 of 2022 at Allahabad

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 17017 of 2022 Shyam Manohar Gupta .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Arvind Kumar Verma, Mahesh Sharma Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. With WRIT - A No. - 16803 of 2025 Shyam Manohar Gupta .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mahesh Sharma, Suraj Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 33 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard Sri Mahesh Sharma, learned counsel for the writ petitioner and Sri R.S. Umrao, learned Standing Counsel for the State. 2. Sri R.S. Umrao, learned Standing Counsel has made a statement at bar that already affidavits have been exchanged in the leading writ petition and he has full instructions and he is in a position to argue the matter on merits and he does not propose to file any further affidavit, thus, the writ petitions be decided on the basis of the documents available on record. With the consent of the parties, the writ petitions are being decided at this stage. 3. The case of the writ petitioner is that the writ petitioner was engaged as a Seasonal Collection Amin