Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-01-22

WRIT - A No. 13 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - A No. 13 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - A No. 13 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 13 of 2026 Snigdha Dhusiya .....Petitioner(s) Versus Union Of India And Another .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dheeraj Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I. Court No. - 33 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard Sri Dheeraj Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Ravi Prakash Singh, counsel for the respondents. 2. A preliminary objection has been raised by Sri Ravi Prakash Singh, counsel for the respondents that the writ petition itself may not be maintainable as the writ petitioner has alternative efficacious remedy while preferring original application before the Commandant, Central Ordnance Depot (C.O.D.), Chheoki, Allahabad, having territorial jurisdiction over the matter. Since the writ petitioner happens to be claiming the family pension on account of death of the father of the writ petitioner who was working as Carpenter in the office of respondent no. 2. 3. Confronted with the same, the writ petitioner seeks to withdraw the present writ petition while preferring appropriate proceedings before the Court having jurisdiction. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed off granting lib

WRIT - A No. 13 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam