Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-01-30

WRIT - A No. 1236 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - A No. 1236 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - A No. 1236 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 1236 of 2026 Anand Yadav .....Petitioner(s) Versus Union Of India And Another .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Lalit Kumar Gond Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I., Gopal Verma Court No. - 33 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard Sri Lalit Kumar Gond, learned counsel for the writ petitioner and Sri Gopal Verma, learned counsel for the respondents. 2. The grievance of the writ petitioner is that he had participated for appointment on the post of Agniveer, however, he has not been accorded joining. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents has produced before this Court a second show cause notice issued to the writ petitioner on 17.01.2026 requiring the writ petitioner to submit reply as to why appointment be not cancelled. 4. Learned counsel for the writ petitioner submits that the writ petitioner shall file an objection to the same, if not filed. 5. In case such an objection is preferred, the Court has no reason to disbelieve that the same shall be decided in accordance with law. 6. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition stands disposed of. 7. Instructions filed today are taken on record and marked as Appendi

WRIT - A No. 1236 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam