Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-01-20

WRIT - A No. 111 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - A No. 111 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - A No. 111 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 111 of 2026 Baliram .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of Uttar Pradesh And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Siddharth Khare, Sr. Advocate Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 33 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard Sri Ashok Khare, Senior Advocate assisted by Shri Himanshu Singh (A/H 0277/2019) holding brief of Sri Siddharth Khare, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri R.S Umrao, learned Standing Counsel, who appears for State-respondents. 2. The counsel for the rival parties have made a joint statement that they do not propose to file any further affidavits thus with the consent of the parties, writ petition is being decided at the fresh stage. 3. The case of the writ petitioner is that he was directly recruited and posted on the post of Sub Deputy Inspector of Schools in the year 2006. The same stood re-designated as Block Education Officer. It is also the case of the writ petitioner that he has been transferred from one place to another and since February 2022, the writ petitioner was posted in District Mau. While the writ petitioner was posted as Block Education Officer, Development Block Bad

WRIT - A No. 111 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam