Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-01-29

WRIT - A No. 1099 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - A No. 1099 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - A No. 1099 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 1099 of 2026 Israr Ali .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Javed Alam, Nasim Uddin Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 33 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Sri Javed Alam, learned counsel for the writ petitioner submits that though the present petition has been preferred against the punishment order dated 23.07.2025, however, he seeks withdrawal of the writ petitioner while preferring appeal under Rule 20 of the Uttar Pradesh Police Officers of Subordinate Rank (Punishment and Appeal) Rules 1991. His anxiety is that appeal be decided within short time. 2. In the opinion of the Court once the writ petitioner prefers an appeal, then the Court has no reason to disbelieve that the same shall be decided with most expedition. 3. In case, there is a delay, it is always open for the applicant to seek condonation of the delay, which would be considered strictly in accordance with law. 4. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition stands disposed of. January 29, 2026 N.S.Rathour (Vikas Budhwar,J.) Digitally signed by :- NIPENDRA SINGH RATHOUR High Court of Judica

WRIT - A No. 1099 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam