Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-01-29

WRIT - A No. 1090 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - A No. 1090 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - A No. 1090 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 1090 of 2026 Anita Singh .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dilip Kumar Upadhyay Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 33 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard Sri Dilip Kumar Upadhyay, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Rahul Malviya, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel, who appears for State-respondents. 2. The counsel for the rival parties have made a joint statement that they do not propose to file any further affidavits thus with the consent of the parties, writ petition is being decided at the fresh stage. 3. The case of the writ petitioner is that is that she happens to be a woman constable working in Ghazipur since February 2015, she had preferred Writ- A No. 18122 of 2025 seeking transfer from Ghazipur to Meerut or Hapur. The representation so preferred by the writ petitioner came to be rejected on 08.01.2026 by the Inspector General of Police (Establishment) U.P. at Lucknow. 4. Questioning the same, the writ petitioner has been filed the present writ petition. 5. Learned counsel for the writ petitioner has submitted that the order impug

WRIT - A No. 1090 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam