WRIT - A No. 1047 of 2026 at Allahabad

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 1047 of 2026 Kamesh Chandra Pal .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Devansh Misra, Ramesh Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : Arjun Prasad Yadav, C.S.C. Court No. - 33 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard Sri Devansh Misra, learned counsel for the writ petitioner and Sri S.K. Pal, learned Addl. Chief Standing Counsel for Respondent Nos. 1, 3 and 4 and Sri Arjun Prasad Yadav for the Respondent nos. 2 and 5. 2. A statement has been made by learned counsel for the respondents that they are well equipped with the instructions and are in a position to argue the case. They do not propose to file any affidavit and they further submit that the writ petition be decided on the basis of the documents available on record. 3. With the consent of the parties, the writ petition is being decided at the fresh stage. 4. The case of the writ petitioner is that the writ petitioner was engaged on contractual basis as a Computer Operator in the office of the Basic Shiksha Adhikari, Bijnor under the State Mid Day Meal Scheme on 29.03.2008 for a period of one year. As per the writ petiti