Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-01-29

WRIT - A No. 1039 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - A No. 1039 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - A No. 1039 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 1039 of 2026 Ajay Kumar Pandey .....Petitioner(s) Versus Union Of India And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Raj Kishore Pandey, Ravi Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I., Shiv Kumar Pal Court No. - 33 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard Sri R.K. Pandey, learned counsel for the writ petitioner and Sri S.K. Pal, learned counsel for the respondents. 2. Sri S.K. Pal, learned counsel for the respondents has made a statement that he is well equipped with the instructions and is in a position to argue the case. He does not propose to file any counter affidavit and he further submits that the writ petition be decided on the basis of the documents available on record. 3. With the consent of the parties, the writ petition is being decided at the fresh stage. 4. The case of the writ petitioner is that he was appointed as a Constable in RPF on 01.11.2014. He was also sent for training and he completed his training, therefore, the writ petitioner was transferred to various places and on 23.03.2024, on a mutual transfer, the petitioner was transferred from South Eastern Central Zone to North Central Railway Zone a

WRIT - A No. 1039 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam