Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-01-29

WRIT - A No. 1032 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - A No. 1032 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - A No. 1032 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 1032 of 2026 Ramesh Chandra .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of Uttar Pradesh And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Nirbhay Kumar Bharti Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 33 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard Sri Nirbhay Kumar Bharti, learned counsel for the writ petitioner and Sri Gaurav Singh, learned Standing Counsel for the State. 2. The case of the writ petitioner is that he was initially appointed as Junior Engineer on 22.08.1990 and promoted as Assistant Engineer on 22.08.2008 and further promoted as Executive Engineer on 30.06.2022. According to the writ petitioner, there is an error in the pay-fixation of the writ petitioner. It is also the case of the writ petitioner that the writ petitioner superannuated on 31.12.2022. 3. Prayer in the present writ petition is for a direction to correct the pay- scale. 4. Learned Standing Counsel on the other hand submits that the claim of the writ petitioner needs adjudication at the first instance by Respondent no.4. 5. Considering the submissions so made across the Bar, the writ petition stands disposed of directing the writ petitioner to prefer a c

WRIT - A No. 1032 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam