Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-01-28

WRIT - A No. 1018 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - A No. 1018 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - A No. 1018 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 1018 of 2026 Sunil Sharma .....Petitioner(s) Versus Union Of India And Another .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Abhay Kumar Agarwal, Ajay Vikram Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I. Court No. - 33 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard Sri Ajay Vikram Singh, learned counsel for the writ petitioner and Vinay Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the respondents. 2. A preliminary objection has been raised by the learned counsel for the respondents that this Court may not have territorial jurisdiction to entertain the writ petition particularly when the authorities against whom relief has been sought are stationed in New Delhi. 3. The said fact could not be disputed by learned counsel for the writ petitioner. 4. Accordingly, in view of the law laid down by this Court in Rajendra Kumar Mishra Vs. Union of India (2005) 1 UPLBEC 108. Interference is declined, the writ petition stands disposed of leaving it open to the writ petitioner to approach the Court have territorial jurisdiction over the matter. (Vikas Budhwar,J.) January 28, 2026 Rajesh Digitally signed by :- RAJESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

WRIT - A No. 1018 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam